Solid-State Electrolytes: Structure–Ionics–Interface Coupling in Next-Generation Batteries

Authors

    Jeroen Bakker Department of Electrical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands
    Lina Bergström * Department of Energy Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden lina.bergstrom@kth.se

Keywords:

Solid-state electrolytes, ionic conductivity, interface engineering, all-solid-state batteries, defect chemistry, microstructure, hybrid composites

Abstract

This study aims to synthesize current knowledge on solid-state electrolytes by examining the interdependent relationships among structural architecture, ionic transport, and interface coupling to inform the design of next-generation all-solid-state batteries. A qualitative systematic review was conducted using 25 high-impact peer-reviewed articles published between 2018 and 2025, focusing on ceramic, sulfide, halide, and composite solid-state electrolytes. Data were collected exclusively via literature review and analyzed using NVivo 14 software to perform open, axial, and selective coding, achieving theoretical saturation. Key variables extracted included crystal structure, defect chemistry, ionic conductivity, microstructure, electrode compatibility, interfacial stability, and mechanical robustness. Thematic analysis identified four overarching categories with multiple subthemes, encompassing structure, ionics, interface, and design integration. The review revealed that crystal structure and defect engineering directly influence ionic conductivity, with high-symmetry lattices and controlled vacancy distributions enhancing Li⁺ or Na⁺ mobility. Microstructural and composite design strategies, including grain refinement and polymer–ceramic hybrids, improve mechanical stability while facilitating continuous ion transport pathways. Interfacial coupling between electrolytes and electrodes was found to be critical for minimizing impedance and preventing degradation, with buffer layers, surface coatings, and stack pressure demonstrating efficacy in maintaining stable contact. The integration of structural, ionic, and interfacial considerations emerged as a holistic design principle, emphasizing that performance improvements depend on concurrent optimization across these dimensions. Emerging computational modeling and in-situ characterization techniques support predictive design and real-time monitoring of structure–ionics–interface interactions. Optimizing solid-state electrolytes requires a coupled approach that integrates atomic-scale structure, ion transport behavior, and interface engineering. Holistic design strategies, informed by multi-scale modeling, advanced characterization, and hybrid composite systems, are essential to advancing the commercial viability of all-solid-state batteries with high energy density, safety, and cycle life.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Carrasco, J. (2024). A theoretical perspective on solid-state ionic interfaces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

Choi, S. K. (2024). A review of inorganic solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. Powder Materials Journal.

Feng, X. (2022). Review of modification strategies in emerging inorganic solid-state electrolytes. Joule.

Grill, J., et al. (2024). Solid-state inorganic electrolytes for next generation batteries.

Jia, L., et al. (2024). Li–solid electrolyte interfaces/interphases in all-solid-state lithium batteries.

Joshi, A., et al. (2025). A comprehensive review of solid-state batteries. Energy & Power Materials Journal.

Liu, J., et al. (2023). Review of the developments and difficulties in inorganic solid-state electrolytes. PMC.

Ma, M., Zhang, M., Jiang, B., Du, Y., Hu, B., & Sun, C. (2023). A review of all-solid-state electrolytes for lithium batteries: High-voltage cathode materials, solid-state electrolytes and electrode–electrolyte interfaces. Materials Chemistry Frontiers, 7, 1268–1297.

Nie, K., et al. (2018). Interfaces between cathode and electrolyte in solid-state lithium batteries. Frontiers in Chemistry.

Thomas, F., et al. (2024). Technological advances and market developments of solid-state battery systems. Materials.

Xie, W., Deng, Z., Liu, Z., Famprikis, T., Butler, K. T., & Canepa, P. (2023). Effects of grain boundaries and surfaces on electronic and mechanical properties of solid electrolytes. arXiv.

Xu, L., et al. (2018). Interfaces in solid-state lithium batteries. Advanced Energy Materials.

Yang, J., et al. (2025). Research advances in interface engineering of solid-state batteries. Cell Network Letters.

Zhu, Q., et al. (2023). Solid-state electrolyte for lithium-air batteries: A review. PMC.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-01

Submitted

2023-11-24

Revised

2023-12-28

Accepted

2024-01-05

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Bakker, J., & Bergström, L. (2024). Solid-State Electrolytes: Structure–Ionics–Interface Coupling in Next-Generation Batteries. Multidisciplinary Engineering Science Open, 1, 1-11. https://www.jmesopen.com/index.php/jmesopen/article/view/28

Similar Articles

1-10 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.